As Remark.as in another product than Write.as it’s easy as to not use it.
Haha. OK, let me re-phrase that: If its optional, WOOHOO, go for it .
I love the idea of a comment system that is native and optional for write.as. The biggest feature that I’d want to see is the ability to import comments from social (whether it’s activity pub or otherwise). However, I don’t think that’s a game changer. Honestly, if comments looked like/worked like they do here, that would be pretty dope.
Gab is doing some interesting things with comments. Not sure if it might provide any relevant ideas for Remark.as, but just sharing because it’s getting some buzz and had a decent take-up by users.
I tested the federated comments between mastodon and Peertube it’s really interesting: the same discussion on different devices of the fediverse
@matt Do you know this project:
It’s open source software using Go, and the code is on GitLab:
I don’t understand the part about Comments being delivered by email? Am I missing something? Thanks.
I’m thinking that in the future, readers who are subscribed via email will be able to reply to individual posts via email, and be able to comment on them that way.
I like that capability. Are you saying email capability instead of a comment section? Or capability for both or either? Thanks.
I’m thinking both, or either – giving you the option to accept responses at all, and the option to have any responses sent that way shown in your comment section.
Wow, thank you, Matt. That sounds awesome.
This may have been mentioned, I didn’t read 100% of the responses. But the ability to turn comments on by the post… sometimes you want input and sometimes you just want to speak your mind without others opinions… thoughts?
I am very much interested in Remark.as available to install as own instance. Considering great experience provided by WriteFreely, I expect you guys can make Remark.as as one more clean, fast and smooth open source project.
Even though I got into fediverse this year, I already enjoy Mastodon, PeerTube and WriteFreely. While Mastodon is excellent Twitter alternative, I use WriteFreely as draft notebook for quick notes that some time in the future might become full featured posts on my heavyweight blog. It would be great to receive ActivityPub comments to WriteFreely posts!
While PeerTube has fediverse comments capability, my wish would be to have comments system to integrate with WriteFreely (and perhaps PeerTube too?) to have single comments lifecycle (moderation, user authentication, etc.).
If/when Snap.as goes public as open source project, it could also reuse Remark.as for it’s comment functionality.
Main driver for me to choose WriteFreely was aim to learn Go lang so I hope in a while I’ll be able to contribute and hopefully help with Snap.as and Remark.as if/when they become open source
Would this be something under the control of each individual user, or something, say, a WriteFreely instance admin could set instance-wide rules for? Asking because should I move toward setting up a WriteFreely community I would want to disallow comment anonymity, and certainly disallow being able to morph oneself between different single-use usernames, because that feature risks preventing me from being able to punish code of conduct violations site-wide.
Great point. Again these are still just ideas for now. But either way, the version usable with WriteFreely would be configurable by the instance admin first, and then by the individual users. (And perhaps the ability for users to configure things themselves could be configurable by an instance admin.)
Maybe I didn’t express myself well enough. It’s just an idea, though.
Why we can`t show activity pub reactions below the content? For example, I published content and someone in mastodon respond via tooth. Why not show this below the content? If you think the cause for abuse, maybe a little moderation tool fixes this problem.
Forgive the slightly extreme comparison, but having comments or not is the differentiator between thinking oneself to be infallible and knowing that you aren’t. It’s dictator vs. scientist, closed vs. open, Trump vs. Denmark. Openness is more than being open to content, it should also include being open to discussion.
Now, “comments” by or in themselves aren’t really needed. What seems to be needed is a pingback/webmention system, one that is “open” enough to not be stuck inside the own architecture. IndieWeb/POSSE like webmentions, integration of Twitter/Mastodon content, with linkback and the goose’s fed.
@matt, do you know Derek Sivers blog? He gets hundreds of comments by thoughtful people without spammers or trolls getting published.
It’s a shining example of how good comments on a personal blog can be. No social media required.
Here’s an example post, right on topic for Write.as users.
Not sure for me, but for a friend of mine new to write.as: yes, definitely.
We would both contribute for a crowdfunding campaign.